![]() Yes, they are more user friendly, but they still do not follow many of the common OS UI models, and you still are interacting with a single-purpose programming language for any customization. Org mode is one of the few unique bits of software available only on Emacs, but you can get 80% (if not more) of its functionality with markdown notes and regular email/calendaring software for 20% (if not less) of the learning curve.ĮDIT: And I'm not ignoring Spacemacs and its kin. Tricky tasks on remote servers, editing files on remote servers? Most places prefer immutable servers, which run peer reviewed remedial scripts via Ansible/Puppet/Chef/Salt. Patches over email or chat? I've only seen that use at any scale with Linux kernel development. Respectfully, you're describing workflows that very few people use today. ![]() * Replace tmux and tmuxinator with emacs-server. * Use emacsclient -tramp when you're SSH'd on a remote box to transparently edit in your local emacs. * Use org mode with org-babel and TRAMP to create interactive notebooks carrying out tricky tasks directly on the remote server from within emacs. Generate snippets on the fly in your team's chat from the currently selected text. * Use one of the IRC clients or emacs-slack to do the same thing. * Use mu4e and magit integration to seemelessly send and apply patches and pull projects and todo items directly from email. * Organize your tasks and projects with org-mode and work seemelessly with your team by syncing with org-trello. I mean if all you want is a text editor, some SCM integration, some build tool integration, syntax highlighting, and code completion then going with a specialized tool just for that is a good choice.īut the power of Emacs is that it can do nigh-anything and everything is a few lines of elisp away from being tightly integrated. Spacemacs, Prelude, and Scimacs are all good options depending on your use-case. You're ignoring distributions of Emacs which are designed to solve this problem by bundling and pre-configuring everything. I'm surprised more people don't do the same. I find myself more eager to write things down. If Gollum stops being maintained, I can use whatever the next best markdown renderer is. If there's a feature I wish it had, I can write a quick bash script to implement it. Edited with vim and a few bash scripts, rendered with a custom deployment of Gollum. ![]() Plain timestamped markdown files linked together. It's silly to use software that isn't making that same investment.Īfter trying Evernote, Workflowy, Notion, wikis, org-mode, and essentially everything else I could find, I gave up and tried building my own system for notes. When you write things down, you're investing in your future. At best it's open source and the maintainers will lose interest in a few years. Ask me anything (part 2)! SecurityĪsk me Anything is a series where we interview experts with uniqueĮxpertise, opinions, and stories.I've given up on using any sort of branded app for notetaking. Snap! - Exoplanet Radio Signals, Mind Control, Text-to-Video, Robot Predictions Spiceworks Originalsįlashback: April 5, 2006: Apple announces Boot Camp, allowing Windows to run on their computers (Read more HERE.)īonus Flashback: April 5, 1975: Soyuz 18-1 became the first man.Okay I have read the many articles on the workflow setups for Offboarding and check and balances that have been posted, which we have in place using Service-Now Task which isn't a problem.The problem we have is actually getting the users to return the ite. Offboarding: Getting the Equipment Back! Best Practices & General IT.Any other ideas as to what is out there? Starting to research now. I can't see spending that extra money for nothing. We have Code42 pro right now, but the new contract is set for a minimum of 100 clients. Backup Software Data Storage, Backup & Recovery.Utlook 2016 seems to have the default set as not indenting, so maybe that's them addressing the issue? Simply give users the ability to strip out excess indenting in long threads. It would be nice of Microsoft addressed this as it's been an issue since Outlook 2003 (at the least). Word removes the indents and uses much less paper and the emails print much nicer. When he receives one of these emails, I have told his staff that the best thing to do is copy and paste the entire email into Word and then print. In outlook, they all use the default setting. On my end, I have all mobile devices set to not indent on replies and forwards but as has been stated already, you can't control the configuration of devices outside of your organization so someone sending one of these to you user(s) will still cause issues. He is not technically literate and gets irate everytime he ends up printing one of these messages that ends up using a ream of paper. I've had this problem with my CEO for years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |