Scite does have a peer-review process, but because it is almost universally closed, readers can’t assess it and with preprints there is no peer review. New alternative metrics, such as altmetrics, show how many times scientific articles have been mentioned on social media and the news but this says nothing of quality. Other heuristics, such as the reputation of the journal, the authors, and the organization they are affiliated with, provide some information but not in enough detail. However, this approach is similar to simply listing which newspapers mention a movie - it’s better than nothing, but it doesn’t make it easy to see what they say. There are platforms that list which articles refer to an article of interest. What if we adopted the same processes that exist to help us find the best TV show, movie, book, or album to science articles? The challenge: how to effectively evaluate scientific literatureįor Netflix and other streaming services, it is easy to see what critics have said about the show by checking out services such as Rotten Tomatoes that aggregate short reviews from journalists around the world and indicates if it is a favorable review or not, essentially giving viewers the capability of seeing dozens of newspaper reviews at once.įor scientific research, there is no such platform that allows audiences to easily determine what the scientific literature says about a research article. Choosing the wrong movie or show can be a nuisance following the wrong line of research can be deadly. Source: Ĭrowd-sourced review and recommendation sites such as MetaCritic and Rotten Tomatoes have helped ease the information overload problem with tv shows and movies, but no such service really exists in research. This contributes an ontological dimension to his theological discourse and grounds its fundamental importance for Christian faith, which he viewed as threatened by the conflict under discussion.Hundreds to thousands of new preprints on COVID-19 are being posted each week. Lastly, John's theology regarding the sixth kind of image, namely the natural icon, is contextualized within the metaphysical/cosmological chain of images he constructs. This study also analyzes the role of matter as charged with divine energy and grace, the function of the icon as symbol, and the development of a cognitive theory in John's treatises on images. He formulates an iconological realism based on the Incarnation. John's iconological thought is Christ-centered and develops the teaching of the Church on Christ's person and two natures. Following a brief outline of the historical, political and theological difficulties relevant to this phenomenon, the Christological and ontological dimensions of John's iconology are presented. ![]() John of Damascus on images in the context of the Byzantine iconoclastic controversies. This stance is followed by a lively debate, involving many authors, the materials of which have not yet been translated and put into full circulation in historical-artistic research. ![]() ![]() In this work, which we could call the first western treatise on images, the icon is freed from its ritual and cult value, and returned to its artistic use, thus determining, according to some scholars, the larger freedom of figurative representation that characterizes western religious art as compared with the Orthodox one. The West, especially the Kingdom of the Franks and the Lombards ruled by Charles, later known as Charlemagne, tried to take an official position in the synod of Frankfurt in 794 and in an odd and complex treatise, comprising four books, entitled Opus Caroli, or Libri Carolini, which were recently attributed by Ann Freeman to Theodulf of Orleans, one of the greatest intellectuals of his time. After a long quarrel scattered with persecutions, uprisings, dismissals and replacements of religious authorities, deaths, military expeditions, confiscations and attempts of assassinations in Greece, Italy and other European areas, the Council of Nicaea, in 787, imposed the victory of the iconodules in the Byzantine Empire.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |